Page 25 - gfs0718_Magazine
P. 25

MILITARY CULINARY AWARDS WRAP-UP




            Appearance/Attitude of Personnel and      CONNELL Y
            Equipment/Faclities/Readiness.

            FIELD CATEGORY
               A separate checklist of 10 categories
            establishes the criteria used to evaluate
            units competing in the Department of
            the Army Field Category level of the
            Connelly program. Field evaluations
            involve units outside the continental
            48 states and involve an in-brief with
            the unit on day one that is the same
            for the garrison and field categories.
            On day two, the unit escorts evaluators
            to the training site to begin their work
            upon arrival. Evaluations encompass
            two consecutive meals: preparation and
            serving of a Uniform Group Rations               ARMY NATIONAL GUARD FIELD KITCHEN
            (UGR) Heat and Serve breakfast and a
            UGR-A lunch/UGR-A-SO (short order)   Winner: 110th Multifunctional Medical Battalion (HHD), Nebraska Army National Guard,
            modules for the lunch meal.         Lincoln, Neb.
               Units competing in the Reserve and   Commander: 1st Lt. Stephen Condon
            National Guard Connelly category are   Food Service Officer: Chief Warrant Officer 3 K.C. Sohl
            evaluated on one meal (lunch), which   Culinary Management NCO: Sgt. 1st Class Kathrine Struck
            consists of line item A-rations.
               These options (UGR-A, UGR-A SO   Runner-Up: Alpha Company, 198th Expeditionary Signal Battalion, Delaware Army Na-
            and UGR H&S) carry a higher poten-  tional Guard, Georgetown, Del.
            tial for waste and require increased
            management attention at all levels of
            requisitioning and preparation, according to the 2018   it comes to operational rations and line item A rations.
            Connelly Handbook.                                  According to the 2018 handbook, the 92G NCO should
               All units prepare the same meals. Army National Guard   “seek use and approval of enhancements that effectively
            and U.S. Army choose the final meal prior to the evalu-  supplement the meal and lead to quality reception by all
            ation period.                                       diners.”
               Army field feeding facilities are a unique environment   The handbook suggests units can increase points earned
            and the evaluation criteria checklist includes 10 catego-  in this area with trendy additions, such as seasoning or
            ries: Supervision/Training; Headcount Operations/Cash   infusion of a local ingredient.
            Collection; Request, Receipt and Storage of Rations; Field   Nutritional initiatives are a part of menu planning and
            Food Safety; Command Support; Appearance/Attitude of   should incorporate principles provided by regulation, as
            Culinary Personnel; Field Kitchen Set Up/Site Selection/  well as current U.S. Department of Agriculture MyPlate
            Layout; Food Preparation and Quality; Serving/Troop Ac-  guidelines.
            ceptability; and Use and Maintenance of Equipment.     Second most influential on a unit’s total score are the
               Similar to the Garrison level, each field category contains   possible 180 points that can be earned in the Serving/
            a set of criteria covering all phases of the competition and   Troop Acceptability category and its eight criteria. Troop
            the maximum score possible a team can earn from each   Acceptability at 30 points has the highest value within
            judge is 1,000 points.                              the category followed by Innovative Set Up and Use of
               The most valuable category is Food Preparation/Qual-  Service Equipment, and Menu and Service items verifica-
            ity with a total rating of 270 points. Judges can award   tion (posted/served), each worth 25 points. The remaining
            30 points for Innovative Menu Improvements and Meal   five criteria are worth 20 points each.
            Production; 25 points each for Nutrition Initiatives, Ad-  Diner’s comments can be sufficient to gauge the qual-
            herence to Production Schedule, Proteins and Sauces, and   ity of items served, but another is to observe the amount
            Food Palatability; and 20 points each for Starches and   of food discarded into waste containers, according to the
            Vegetables, Salads and Dressings, Assorted Breads and   handbook.
            Pastries, Assorted Fresh Fruits, Beverages, Proper Internal   Judges evaluate a unit’s serving line for how smoothly
            Temperatures, and Use of Appropriate Recipes.       customers move through it, but higher point totals can
               In evaluating this category, the units are judged on   be earned by demonstrating innovative use equipment,
            the extent to which the senior 92G NCO makes quality   the handbook advises.
            improvements beyond the standard menu items when                                                —GFS
                                                                         GOVERNMENT FOOD SERVICE • JULY 2018 25
   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30